Decentralized EWM or embedded EWM – which solution fits your company best?

SAP WM will no longer be supported after December 31, 2025, requiring companies to transition to SAP EWM. But the question remains: Which SAP EWM is the right choice for your business? 

Why a decision is needed now 

Both variants of SAP Extended Warehouse Management (EWM) offer different benefits, but the choice strongly depends on your specific requirements for warehouse management, scalability, and system integration. 

We provide a detailed comparison between decentralized EWM and embedded EWM, analyze their functionalities, advantages and disadvantages, and offer a well-founded recommendation to help companies make the right choice. 

 

What is embedded EWM? 

Definition of embedded EWM 

Embedded EWM is an integrated solution within SAP S/4HANA for warehouse and inventory management. It was designed to enable companies to control processes directly without a separate system landscape. Embedded EWM comes in two versions: 

Basic embedded EWM – This version is included by default in SAP S/4HANA and provides basic warehouse management functionalities. 

Advanced embedded EWM – This enhanced version requires a license and includes additional features such as advanced warehouse processes, automation capabilities, and optimized control mechanisms for more complex requirements. 

Advantages of embedded EWM 

Seamless integration: As Embedded EWM is natively integrated into SAP S/4HANA, there is no need for extensive interface adjustments. 

No data replication: Master data and inventory information are directly accessible from the ERP system, avoiding data inconsistencies. 

Reduced maintenance effort: Since Embedded EWM runs within SAP S/4HANA, updates and system maintenance are simplified. 

Disadvantages of embedded EWM 

Limited scalability depending on the version: The scalability of Embedded EWM depends on the chosen variant. While the Basic version is more suitable for small to medium-sized warehouses, the Advanced version offers additional features like extended automation and optimized warehouse processes, supporting larger and more complex warehouse structures. However, compared to decentralized EWM, Embedded EWM remains less flexible when it comes to integrating multiple ERP systems or enabling cross-site usage. 

Dependence on SAP S/4HANA: Companies using multiple ERP systems cannot deploy embedded EWM flexibly across different locations. 

 

What is decentralized EWM? 

Definition of decentralized EWM 

Decentralized EWM is a standalone warehouse management solution that operates independently of the ERP system in use. It is suitable for companies with complex logistics processes and multiple SAP or third-party ERP systems. 

Advantages of decentralized EWM 

Greater scalability: Companies with large logistics networks benefit from the independent architecture. 

System independence: Decentralized EWM can communicate with various ERP systems. 

Higher performance: Especially in environments with high warehouse activity and complex material flows, the decoupled system architecture of decentralized EWM enables better load distribution by offloading processing to separate systems. This reduces the load on the central ERP system and ensures stable system performance even in heavily utilized logistics networks with multiple warehouse locations or high levels of automation. 

Disadvantages of decentralized EWM 

Higher implementation effort: Integrating into existing system landscapes is more complex, as decentralized EWM operates as a separate system and requires a dedicated IT infrastructure. 

More costly: Due to higher licensing, infrastructure, and maintenance expenses, decentralized EWM can be more expensive than embedded EWM. Companies also need to consider the additional effort for interface maintenance and data replication. 

Need for continuous data replication: Operating decentralized EWM requires ongoing synchronization of master data and inventory information with the ERP system. This not only increases integration complexity but can also lead to synchronization issues if data is not updated consistently or promptly. 

  

Embedded EWM vs. decentralized EWM: technical comparison 

Cost analysis: embedded EWM vs. decentralized EWM 

Cost is a key factor when choosing between embedded and decentralized EWM. Embedded EWM is integrated into SAP S/4HANA and results in lower infrastructure costs. The Basic version is license-free, while the Advanced version offers extended functionality at an additional cost. Decentralized EWM requires separate licenses, maintenance, and its own IT infrastructure, as well as synchronization of master data with the ERP system. 

License and implementation costs 

Licenses for embedded EWM are included in SAP S/4HANA when companies use the Basic EWM functionality. Only when advanced features are needed does the Advanced EWM version require additional licenses. In contrast, decentralized EWM is a standalone system that demands separate licenses, hardware resources, and IT support. 

Implementation costs vary depending on company size and process complexity. embedded EWM is integrated into existing SAP S/4HANA processes, whereas decentralized EWM requires a separate infrastructure and therefore generally leads to higher initial costs for system setup. 

Maintenance and operating costs 

While embedded EWM is updated alongside SAP S/4HANA, a decentralized system needs its own upgrade and maintenance cycles. According to the SAP Community, this is a critical factor for companies with limited IT resources. SAP updates must be manually tested and deployed for decentralized systems, increasing the maintenance workload. 

Additional costs arise from setting up and maintaining the interfaces for data exchange between SAP ERP and decentralized EWM. Especially master data distribution via ALE, IDocs, or DRF requires initial configuration and ongoing maintenance to ensure data consistency. Although the initial implementation costs for these interfaces can be substantial, the ongoing operational costs for actual data exchange are typically low and do not significantly impact the budget. 

Scalability and long-term cost consideration 

Decentralized EWM offers high scalability and flexibility, especially for companies with multiple warehouse locations, complex logistics processes, or heterogeneous ERP landscapes. On the flip side, it comes with higher effort for implementation, operation, and system integration. 

Embedded EWM scores with lower ongoing costs and reduced administrative effort but is more tightly bound to the central S/4HANA system in terms of functionality. 

Overall, total costs tend to be lower with Embedded EWM - provided the company does not require particularly deep or specialized EWM functionalities. 

 

SAP EWM migration: how to ensure a smooth transition 

With the end of SAP WM, companies are faced with an important decision. Migrating to either embedded or decentralized EWM requires a thorough analysis of current warehouse management processes, IT infrastructure, and business requirements. 

Key phases of the SAP EWM migration 

1. Initial assessment 
   The first step is analyzing the existing system landscape. This helps identify processes that need to be optimized or reimagined and reveals potential migration challenges early on.
   
   
2. Requirements definition and clean core strategy 
   Migrating from SAP WM to SAP EWM presents an opportunity to critically review current workflows. Following a clean core strategy, it’s advisable to align processes with SAP standards and avoid custom developments. This lays the foundation for a low-maintenance, future-proof system. Functional requirements and necessary integrations are also defined during this phase. 
   
   
3. System selection 
   The choice between Embedded and Decentralized EWM depends on strategic, technical, and operational factors - such as scalability, complexity of warehouse processes, and overall system architecture. 
   
   
4. Migration phase with mock runs 
   Before setting up the production system, mock runs are executed in a test or quality assurance environment. These include functional and integration tests that help identify and resolve technical risks and process discrepancies early on - ensuring a stable and reliable migration. 
   
   
5. Go-Live and continuous optimization 
   After a successful go-live, the focus shifts to continuous improvement. The standardized processes defined earlier simplify fine-tuning and contribute to long-term system efficiency. 

 

Logistics with SAP: which companies benefit from which solution? 

The choice between embedded and decentralized EWM largely depends on company size and logistics strategy. 

Which companies should choose embedded EWM? 

The basic version of embedded EWM is particularly suited for small to mid-sized companies using SAP S/4HANA for warehouse management and handling straightforward warehouse processes. Companies looking for a cost-effective solution without complex system integration or advanced automation features benefit from this option. 

The advanced version, however, offers extended features suitable for larger warehouse structures and more complex processes. Companies with higher levels of automation, multiple storage units, or specific industry requirements (e.g., batch management, cross-docking, or yard management) can benefit from the enhanced functionality - without having to switch to a decentralized system. 

When is decentralized EWM the better choice? 

It is ideal for large enterprises with multiple sites and high warehouse automation. Also for companies operating multiple ERP systems in parallel or those with complex logistics operations requiring high performance. 

Conclusion: decentralized EWM or embedded EWM – which solution is future-proof? 

The decision is a strategic one, influenced by various factors: 

• Companies with standardized processes and lower complexity often benefit from embedded EWM. 

• Large, internationally operating companies with multiple ERP systems and high warehouse volumes typically require decentralized EWM. 

• Businesses that rely on maximum flexibility also tend to favor a decentralized solution. 

With the upcoming discontinuation of SAP WM, it's more important than ever to set the course for the future and choose the EWM variant that best fits your company's needs. 

 Need advice?